A bit harder would be for static and non-static methods, like Response.json() (which we can't document now, embarrassingly, but obviously need to).īeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. be prepared to accept a potentially much more complicated implementation, with a properly abstracted APIįor instance, if we wanted cssxref to be usable for properties ( color) and types ( ), we'd need a way to accommodate that.have a way to deal with items in related but distinct namespaces.design clear rules about what xrefs can be used for.In reality I suppose any group of items which share a namespace could be xreffable. At the moment xrefs are tied to file/URL structure, but yes, that's because we don't have an organized way of saying what kinds of items are supposed to be xreffable, so our usage rules collapse into their current implementation. Fix issues of xrefs by fixing them-not by staying away from them □ Nothing of its API surface requires a particular file structure, and we can simply re-implement the xref so it does a search among various potential locations for the accent-color page. And when you do the book tour, John, out of curiosity, does the publisher. However, such implementation details should not mask away the underpinning idea of an xref: to abstract away the file system structure. Think of these short sluglines as punctuation, little guides to help you make. once mentioned that the CSS xref forced the docs to have a flat structure. I acknowledge that the current xref implementation is far from ideal. (/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array) + (/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Globals/Array)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |